The University of Pennsylvania has become the latest in a series of institutions of higher learning that have dug into their past, unearthed significant ties to slavery and begun trying to figure out how to address repercussions of the historical injustice.
In a statement issued Friday, Penn president Dr. Amy Gutmann summarized the school’s journey from the Penn Slavery Project – which reported initial findings last fall – to a recently completed, more in-depth study by a seven-member working group of administrators, faculty and students.
Dr. Camille Zubrinsky Charles
Here’s some of what was included in the study:
“As an academic institution dedicated to uncovering and conveying the truth, the University is committed to advancing research that will enable us to more fully understand Penn’s linkages to slavery,” Gutmann wrote. “On behalf of the university, I thank the working group, accept its recommendations and charge Provost Wendell Pritchett and Senior Vice President Joann Mitchell to partner with the deans of the appropriate schools to continue to illuminate the university’s connections to slavery and its implications for the present and future.”
Pritchett led the working group and Mitchell, who also is the school’s chief diversity officer, was a member.
Dr. Mary Frances Berry
In line with the group’s recommendations, Gutmann said, the Ivy League school specifically will: support the Penn Slavery Project’s continuing research; support research on how the medical school’s pedagogy, research and medical practices impacted alumni and the lingering effects on medicine; create a university website for research findings and other information; encourage the university’s schools and departments to offer cultural and informational programs to educate the wider community; and join the Universities Studying Slavery consortium to learn from and collaborate with peer institutions.
Penn would be welcomed into the consortium, which has about 40 member schools in the U.S. and abroad, said its co-chair, Dr. Kirt von Daacke, assistant dean and professor in the College of Arts and Sciences at the University of Virginia.
“Penn’s findings are yet another reminder that slavery and racism in the American past are not Southern stories, they are American stories,” he said, adding that the revelations are less about an individual school’s history and more about “America becoming more connected to its complicated and difficult past.”
Gutmann’s statement was welcomed by some Black faculty at the school who were not directly involved in the research – and were not surprised by the findings “about Penn’s complicity with slavery at a time when slavery was legal and owning and utilizing slaves was common,” said Dr. Mary Frances Berry, a prominent history professor and Geraldine R. Segal Professor of American Social Thought since 1987.
“Penn, like other institutions, has a direct responsibility for the perpetuation of slavery and racial inequality,” said Berry. “It’s not just abstract. The efforts made toward diversity and inclusion have been slow to succeed for African-American students who are not first- or second-generation African immigrants. Perhaps these findings will inspire greater progress.
“President Gutmann’s acceptance of the report with an endorsement of further research means we will soon learn more details. Now there will be more research, more dissemination and teaching and learning about the findings.”
Dr. Camille Zubrinsky Charles, director of Penn’s Center for African Studies and a faculty member for 20 years, said the next steps outlined by the president sound appropriate. The impact of Penn’s slavery ties on admission and support of students of color, specifically African-American students, must be explored further, she added.
Georgetown University undertook a similar investigation that resulted in granting some admissions preference to descendants of slaves, among other forms of redress. That’s appropriate in cases where ties can be made between specific applicants and specific slaves, Charles said, “but there’s a broader concern around climate, the social climate within and around the university that can have a negative impact on access and achievement for students.”
“I am pleased that we’re confronting this head-on,” she added. “I wouldn’t expect anything less from my institution. …I’m hopeful about where things go from here.”
What Penn and other schools are doing to confront an unpleasant chapter in their history provides opportunities to “shine a critical light on their own past,” something institutions of higher learning historically have failed to do, said von Daacke. He said Brown University led the way in 2003, becoming the “gold standard” for other schools that followed suit, including UVA five years ago and now Penn.
Often, students initiate the historical soul-searching through research and a quest for “honesty,” which draws in faculty and then administrators, said von Daacke.
“It’s not about when you do this, but doing it,” he added. “The right time to do this is when you have the awakening.”
LaMont Jones, Jr., can be reached at firstname.lastname@example.org. You can follow him on Twitter @DrLaMontJones
Should social and emotional learning be incorporated into educational curricula?