Create a free Diverse: Issues In Higher Education account to continue reading

Rutgers President Advises Firms That Work With the University

NEW BRUNSWICK N.J. — Rutgers University’s president sits on advisory boards of two companies that do business with New Jersey’s flagship school, a practice that some business ethicists find troubling.

Rutgers officials gave Robert Barchi permission to serve on the boards of VWR International and Covance Inc. when he was hired last year.

The Record newspaper reports the two companies paid Barchi $317,000 in fees and stock awards for the part-time advisory posts. Barchi, whose salary at Rutgers can reach $747,000 if he receives bonuses, has also accumulated stock in both companies.

Rutgers has paid VWR International, a publicly traded lab supply company, and its subsidiaries $15 million since 2008. The pharmaceutical research firm Covance received about $100,000 since 2008.

In a statement to the newspaper, Barchi said that, because he recognizes the potential for conflict, he has not been involved in any decisions at Rutgers involving the companies since he became school president.

“Rutgers University recognizes the value of having its chief executives serve on corporate boards,” he wrote.

Trustees say they support Barchi’s being on the boards, on which he served before being hired by Rutgers.

But Cary Nelson, a past president of the American Association of University Professors and the co-author of a report due later this year that recommends university policies to avoid conflicts, said Barchi’s involvement with companies that do business with the school is a problem, even if he recuses himself on decisions regarding the businesses.

“What we say is that no administrator should serve on a corporate board or have any kind of financial relationship with a company that does business with the university,” he told The Record. “That’s a fundamental principle that has to be honored.”

A New Track: Fostering Diversity and Equity in Athletics
American sport has always served as a platform for resistance and has been measured and critiqued by how it responds in critical moments of racial and social crises.
Read More
A New Track: Fostering Diversity and Equity in Athletics