The Paradox of Black Male Initiatives
By Kamau Bobb

The City University of New York (CUNY) recently launched a systemwide African American Male Initiative (AAMI) to improve the success and

retention of the Black men on its 11 senior college campuses. The problem at CUNY has become so acute that the AAMI is part of the master plan for the entire system. CUNY’s initiative is just the latest in a long list of similar initiatives. The University System of Georgia instituted a similar plan in 2003 to combat the troubling academic conditions of Black men there.

I am a product of the public education systems in both New York City and Georgia, and an object of these academic initiatives. The initiative objectives, the performance gaps they are based on and the social reality faced by Black male students are an increasingly disconnected trinity. The disconnection comes from a set of debilitating paradoxes.

The general objectives of these initiatives are, as one Southern colleague put it, “like moms and apple pie — who could be against them?” All of the initiatives are designed to (1) identify the obstacles to Black male college admission and retention; (2) devise and support programmatic interventions to mitigate those obstacles; and (3) to provide a small annual budget to accomplish goals one and two. The problem with these initiatives is that they exist in a political climate that is increasingly conservative. The mechanisms that would support their objectives are weakened, if not totally eradicated, by the anti-affirmative action climate in which universities currently exist.

Targeted scholarships, recruitment efforts and campus programs that were designed to specifically address the needs of underrepresented minorities in general, and Black men in particular, have been dismantled or considerably weakened. In addition, the ever-looming threat of lawsuits by anti-affirmative action organizations stifles aggressive program development in this area. This is the essential paradox that undermines the efficacy of these initiatives. Rudyard Kipling’s poem “If” states it beautifully: “Or watch the things you gave your life to, broken, and stoop and build ’em up with worn-out tools,” he wrote. To be successful, a policy must have the proper tools. In this case, the tools available to universities are increasingly dull and inadequate.