Create a free Diverse: Issues In Higher Education account to continue reading

Preferential Admissions Questioned In Court

HONOLULU

A wealthy private school created exclusively for Hawaii’s indigenous people may be forced to admit non-Hawaiians if it loses a legal challenge.

Fifteen judges on the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals will hear arguments today in San Francisco over whether the Kamehameha Schools can continue to limit enrollment to Native Hawaiians.

The case is an important test of racial preference programs in school admissions.

While the courts have generally ruled against favoritism in education based on race, the Kamehameha case is different in that the school was founded based on the will of a Hawaiian princess and doesn’t receive federal funding.

“Her whole intent was to provide a means for educating her people so they could compete in a society that was changing so quickly,” says Kekoa Paulsen, a spokesman for Kamehameha Schools. “We are providing a remedy for a … people in their own homeland who are suffering.”

Hawaii was an independent kingdom until the United States backed the overthrow of the country’s leaders in 1893. It eventually became a U.S. territory and was made a state in 1959.

A three-judge panel of the circuit court in California initially ruled against Kamehameha’s admissions policy with a 2-1 vote in August. But the court announced in February it would reconsider the school’s 118-year-old policy.

The lawsuit was filed on behalf of an anonymous White student who was denied admission to the school in 2003 and claimed he was discriminated against because he didn’t have Hawaiian blood.

“We’ve had a lot of conflict, including the Civil War, about treating people differently based on their race. I think we’re mostly past that, but unfortunately Kamehameha wants to go back to an era of privilege for citizens depending on what race you are,” says Eric Grant, a Sacramento, Calif., attorney representing the boy, who recently graduated from a public school.

Kamehameha Schools was established under the 1883 will of Princess Bernice Pauahi Bishop as part of a trust now worth $6.8 billion. Part of the school’s mission is to counteract historical disadvantages Hawaiians face in employment, education and society.

Admission to the elite school is first granted to all qualified Hawaiian students, and non-Hawaiians may be admitted if there are openings left available. Only one in eight eligible applicants get in, and tuition costs are 60 percent subsidized.

Out of 5,400 students enrolled at the school’s three campuses, only two students do not have Hawaiian ancestry. One of those students initially claimed he was Hawaiian, but his acceptance into the school was rescinded when he couldn’t prove his bloodline. He was later admitted to the school as the result of a legal settlement.

Attorneys for Kamehameha plan to argue that their admissions policy should be permitted to comply with the wishes of the princess’ will and to help remedy some of the wrongs committed during and after the U.S.-backed overthrow of the Hawaiian kingdom, Paulsen says.

“The lands that support Kamehameha Schools … are designated for a certain set of beneficiaries, and the beneficiaries in this case are the children of Native Hawaiian ancestry,” adds Jon Van Dyke, a University of Hawaii law professor who consulted for the school. “The Native Hawaiian people have a great need for education. They are still at the bottom of the socioeconomic ladder.”

A lawyer for the White students counters that claim by saying the school’s history isn’t relevant to the issue of fundamental fairness.

“You have the school saying, ‘Yeah, we discriminate by race, we admit that,’” says John Goemans. “What the hell? That isn’t America.”

— Associated Press
 

Reader comments on this story:

If this is a private institution funded by an estate, how can the state of Hawaii interfere?
-D. Shipley



© Copyright 2005 by DiverseEducation.com

A New Track: Fostering Diversity and Equity in Athletics
American sport has always served as a platform for resistance and has been measured and critiqued by how it responds in critical moments of racial and social crises.
Read More
A New Track: Fostering Diversity and Equity in Athletics