News

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi - excerpts from the Fifth US Circuit Court of Appeals' ruling in the case of Ayers v. Fordice

by Diverse Staff , July 8, 2007

April 23, 1997 Before KING, JOLLY, and DENNIS--Circuit Judges. KING, Circuit Judge:

This case concerns the obligation of the State of Mississippi and the other defendants to dismantle the system of de jure segregation that was maintained in public universities in Mississippi.

After we heard the initial appeal of this case in 1990, the Supreme Court established, for the first time, the standards for determining in the university context whether a state has met its affirmative obligation to dismantle its prior de jure system. We now review the district court's ruling following trial on remand to determine whether it erred in its application of these standards. For the reasons set forth below, we affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand the case to the district court for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

I. BACKGROUND

Mississippi's system of public four-year universities was formally segregated by race from its inception in 1848 through 1962, when the first black student was admitted to the University of Mississippi by order of this court. The racial identifiability of Mississippi's eight public universities changed little during the decade following the landmark admission of James Meredith. The student composition of the University of Mississippi, Mississippi State University, Mississippi University for Women, University Of Southern Mississippi, and Delta State University (collectively, "historically white institutions" or "HWIs") remained almost entirely white, while that of Jackson State University, Mississippi Valley State University, and Alcorn State University (collectively, "historically black institutions" or "HBIs") remained almost entirely black. The racial identifiability of these institutions persists to the present.

Private plaintiffs initiated this class action in 1975, complaining that Mississippi was maintaining a racially dual system of higher education in violation of the Fifth, Ninth, Thirteenth, and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution and Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. The United States intervened as plaintiff and alleged violations of the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment and Title VI. For twelve years the parties attempted to resolve their differences through voluntary dismantlement of the prior segregated system. Unable to achieve ultimate agreement, the parties proceeded to trial in 1987. The district court ruled that Mississippi had discharged its affirmative duty to dismantle the former de jure segregated system of higher education through its adoption and implementation of good-faith, race-neutral policies and procedures in student admissions and other areas. Sitting en banc, this court affirmed. The United States Supreme Court granted certiorari.

1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14
Comments posted here may be reprinted in Diverse: Issues In Higher Education magazine, and may be edited for purposes of clarity and/or space.




FEATURED jobs
Full Time, Tenure Track Faculty
North Seattle Community College

North Seattle Community College (NSCC) is seeking dynamic and collaborative individuals for Faculty positions in Business, Physics, and Visual Arts. These tenure-track positions will be generalists able to prepare and teach courses in their related field.


Enterprise Application Services Business Analyst
Ithaca College

The department of Enterprise Application Services within Ithaca College's Office of Information Technology Services (ITS) invites applications for a Business Analyst position to collaborate with departments across campus to identify, define and document business requirements as part of Enterprise Application Services (EAS)...


Business and Economics Librarian
Cornell University

Requires: Familiarity with software and tools for information management. Excellent communication, presentation, and interpersonal skills. Must enjoy providing services to a diverse audience. Demonstrated initiative and flexibility, and ability to work independently and collaboratively.


Chief Information Officer
State University of New York

The State University of New York (SUNY), the nation s largest and most comprehensive system of public higher education, seeks a Chief Information Officer (CIO). This position is located in Albany, New York at the System Administration of the State University of New York.


Copyright 2012 © Diverse: Issues In Higher Education, a CMA publication.
Cox, Matthews, and Associates, Inc., 10520 Warwick Ave, Suite B-8, Fairfax, VA 22030