Illinois Scandal Exposes Favoritism in Admissions - Higher Education


Higher Education News and Jobs

Illinois Scandal Exposes Favoritism in Admissions

by JUSTIN POPE, Associated Press Education Writer

A Chicago Tribune investigative report this past week about how the University of Illinois gives extra consideration to well-connected applicants has set off a storm of protests, prompting the school to change its practices and sending politicians who made use of the rules running for cover.

 

But the truth is, many universities – public and private alike – give special treatment to some degree to the sons and daughters of big donors, politicians, trustees and others with control over the school’s purse strings or other clout, admissions experts say.

 

“The admissions offices are essentially being held over a barrel,” said David Hawkins of the National Association for College Admission Counseling. “How can they really say no when the directives come from the very top of the institution?”

 

Whether formalized or not, “virtually every selective college, public or private, has some kind of list” like the one maintained by the University of Illinois, said Daniel Golden, whose 2006 book, The Price of Admission, exposed admissions practices that favored well-connected applicants.

 

Golden’s reporting focused mostly on elite private universities such as Duke, Stanford, Brown and Harvard. But the Illinois story shows how far “the problem goes of colleges essentially trading admissions slots for favors,” Golden said. “Here you have a flagship state institution essentially making a lot of slots available to candidates who aren’t as strong as some they reject.”

 

In interviews this week, officials at several public universities acknowledged there is no absolute wall between admissions officers and other parts of their institutions, such as the fundraisers and lobbyists. But they insisted they have tight rules and no separate category for applicants, such as that maintained at Illinois.

 

At the University of Florida, Zina Evans, associate provost for enrollment management, said that, when fundraisers signal an interest in a candidate, the only favor they receive is a courtesy heads-up when the decision is made.

 

The school tells applicants it does not accept letters of recommendation, and she said they are not considered in the regular admissions process. However, she acknowledged such letters can come into play if a decision is appealed.

 

At the University of Virginia, university fundraisers are not supposed to approach admissions staffers directly about candidates. However, Carol Wood, assistant vice president for public affairs, acknowledged in an e-mail it sometimes happens.

 

The office of UVA’s president may also get involved. When a request for help arrives there, a staff member decides “if it is appropriate to ask the dean of admission to take an additional look at a student’s application,” Wood said. She emphasized there is no guarantee of admission.

 

Several experts said the system described at Illinois may have crossed some important lines. The university, the Tribune reported, considered hundreds of connected applicants as a separate set of applicants called “Category I” that was not publicized.

 

Illinois insists that no unqualified students were admitted and that it is impossible to say how many would have gotten in otherwise. However, the Tribune found they were accepted at a higher rate than their test scores would predict.

 

“I had never heard of such a formalized process of circumventing the public rules the university has articulated itself,” said Barmak Nassirian, associate executive director of the American Association of Collegiate Registrars and Admissions Officers. “It is over the top in terms of the obviousness with which they were treating some people quite differently.”

 

Among the applicants on the clout list at Illinois was a relative of Tony Rezko, a key figure in the corruption scandal that brought down former Gov. Rod Blagojevich. The admissions office initially rejected the unidentified relative, but the Tribune reported the decision was reversed following an e-mail from university President B. Joseph White that noted the governor’s backing.

 

Last week, White issued a statement calling it a sound and common practice to keep track of “expressions of interest in particular applicants” by alumni, politicians, trustees and others. But on Monday he said the university would drop the Category I system pending a review.

 

 “We have lots of students who complain every year they can’t get into the university,” said Lianne Musser, college coordinator at Lyons Township High School, in suburban Chicago, which sends about 85 students to the university each year.

 

“The feeling is, if it were a private university, you might expect some people would have more sway – donors, politicians. But in a state university, the expectation is that people would have an equal chance,” she said.



© Copyright 2005 by DiverseEducation.com

Semantic Tags:

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *