News

Research Corner: Leadership Affects Tie Between Diversity, Voluntary Turnover

by Dr. David A. Kravitz and Dr. Renee Yuengling , November 22, 2011

Dr. Renee Yuengling
Dr. Renee Yuengling

Common sense suggests that leadership should affect the relation between diversity and group performance, but common sense is frequently wrong and invariably imprecise. Fortunately, scientific research can be used to evaluate conclusions based on common sense. A nice illustration is provided in a recent paper by Lisa Nishii of Cornell University and David Mayer of the University of Michigan.

As Nishii and Mayer point out, past research has found inconsistent relations between group diversity and performance. They propose that this inconsistency is due in part to differences in leader behavior.

Specifically, when managers develop good relationships with all their subordinates, the negative effects of diversity are diminished, eliminated or reversed. Although those of us in the diversity arena tend to emphasize the positive effects of diversity, it is important to acknowledge that diversity also may have negative effects. Nishii and Mayer point out that diversity can stimulate in-group favoritism, relational conflict, miscommunication, power imbalances, and the like, all of which may motivate group members to leave. Thus, they explore the relation between diversity and voluntary turnover—and how this relation can be affected by leader behavior.

Leader behavior can be analyzed and described in many ways. Nishii and Mayer adopt the well-established leader-member exchange, or LMX, theory of leadership. Briefly, LMX theory posits that leader-employee relations vary in their quality. With some employees, leaders develop high-quality social exchange relationships. With other employees, the relationships are of lower quality and limited to economic exchanges. Nishii and Mayer argue that negative effects of diversity should be diminished when the average level of LMX is high (on average, the leader has high quality relations with subordinates), when LMX differentiation is low (the leader has similar relations with all subordinates), and especially when the average level of LMX is high and the differentiation is low (the leader has high quality relations with all subordinates).

1 | 2 | 3
Comments posted here may be reprinted in Diverse: Issues In Higher Education magazine, and may be edited for purposes of clarity and/or space.



blog comments powered by Disqus

Story Tools

Popular Topics


FEATURED jobs
Assistant Director of Athletic Marketing
University of Northern Iowa

Develops plans for season ticket and group ticket sales; oversees the marketing plans for at least two sports as determined by the athletic marketing department; coordinates the Panther Kids Club program; designs promotional materials; and assists with press releases and game-day media coverage as needed.


Assistant Clinical Professor
Drexel University

This individual will work half-time in the Physician Assistant Program and half-time in a clinical practice associated with DrexelAcademic advising of students and membership on standing, ad hoc, search and special committee and task forces to university, college and program levels.


Business Manager (Budget & Fin Reporting Mgr)
University of Maryland, College Park

The Budget & Financial Reporting Manager is responsible for monitoring the budget activity for the several offices within the University Relations Division, including the Office of the Vice President, and will have oversight over expenditures made by these offices to ensure that expenditures...


Assistant Dean, Division of Teacher Education
Wayne State University

Responsible for the academic, administrative, budgetary and research leadership of the division; provide academic leadership in teacher preparation for the division, college and university.


Copyright 2012 © Diverse: Issues In Higher Education, a CMA publication.
Cox, Matthews, and Associates, Inc., 10520 Warwick Ave, Suite B-8, Fairfax, VA 22030