News

The National ‘Expertise Gap’

by Kendra Hamilton , July 14, 2005

The National ‘Expertise Gap’

Experts say America’s dependence on foreign nationals to fill doctoral ranks has national security implications

By Kendra Hamilton

In 1957, the Sputnik launch galvanized all levels of American society to pour unprecedented resources into science and technology education. In 1983, “A Nation at Risk” raised questions over accountability and standards in education that are still being debated.

Now, the Woodrow Wilson National Fellowship Foundation is insisting that the nation stands at a crossroads that is, in its way, every bit as significant as either of those moments in history. Its report — “Diversity and the Ph.D.,” released in May — documents in troubling detail the exact dimensions of what the foundation’s president, Dr. Robert Weisbuch, is calling the national “expertise gap.”

It’s a gap, he says, that “extends beyond the professoriate. It is diminishing our national leadership in any number of professional endeavors, from determining economic policy to designing museums to inventing new pharmaceuticals.

“Indeed, given our current dependence on foreign nationals to flesh out the doctoral ranks — one in three Ph.D. recipients in 2003 was an international student — it’s a gap that has national security implications.”

Unfortunately, in the summer of the Michael Jackson three-ring circus, the “runaway bride” and the Alabama teen missing in Aruba, few in the media or in society at large appear to have tuned in.
But the weight of the evidence assembled by the report adds up to something far more chilling than the familiar “diversity lags at the Ph.D. level” headlines suggest — because for the first time, the figures on doctoral attainment are placed in the context of the political climate, which, more and more, is openly hostile to diversity.

For example, the report notes that, despite nearly two decades of incremental progress, minority representation in academia remains stalled far below levels of representation in society. While nearly one in three — or 32 percent — of the U.S. doctoral age population was African-American or Hispanic in 2003, only one in nine — or 11 percent — of the doctorates awarded went to candidates from those groups. Indeed, if one includes international students in the total Ph.D.s awarded, Blacks and Latinos drop to only 7 percent of the total — or one in 14.

1 | 2 | 3 | 4
Comments posted here may be reprinted in Diverse: Issues In Higher Education magazine, and may be edited for purposes of clarity and/or space.




FEATURED jobs
Provost and Executive VP for Academic Affairs
The University of Toledo

The University of Toledo, a Carnegie Foundation Research University seeks a dynamic leader with experience in organizational transformation. The candidate must possess an earned doctorate or terminal degree and have passion for teaching, learning and innovation. Prior government...


Clinician Educator
Stanford University

Applications are invited from individuals who have completed clinical training in anesthesia, and who have additional experience appropriate for an academic career for positions as Clinical Instructor, Clinical Assistant Professor, Clinical Associate Professor, Clinical Professor ...


Accounting Manager
University of Baltimore

Reporting to the Associate Comptroller, the Accounting Manager is responsible for the accurate and timely management of the processing of payroll. Serves as the business owner and subject matter expert for the various PeopleSoft modules and other technologies utilized...


Faculty Development Specialist
The University of Scranton

Job Summary/Basic Function: Support innovative teaching informed by the scholarship of teaching and learning and best practices in curriculum design and delivery. Sustain a university-wide conversation on teaching and student learning outcomes.


Copyright 2012 © Diverse: Issues In Higher Education, a CMA publication.
Cox, Matthews, and Associates, Inc., 10520 Warwick Ave, Suite B-8, Fairfax, VA 22030