Calls for a financial settlement for the five wrongly imprisoned men and Elizabeth Lederer’s ouster intensified recently after a documentary on the case was broadcast on PBS.
NEW YORK — Twenty-four years after five Black and Latino teenagers were wrongfully imprisoned and convicted for raping and beating a White female jogger in Central Park, hundreds of activists converged in the park Saturday to demand that the city settle a lawsuit filed by the men now known as the “Central Park Five.”
Holding signs and chanting, the activists also called attention to an online petition that is currently circulating, calling on Columbia University to fire part-time law professor Elizabeth Lederer who along with Linda Fairstein were the lead prosecutors who handled the botched 1989 case.
“Elizabeth Lederer was among those who destroyed the lives of these young men by moving forward with her case even though there was no credible evidence, except coerced confessions demanded by police officers,” says Charles Johnson, a community activist and an alumnus of the Ivy League school. “It’s scary to think that she is now training the next generation of lawyers. She really needs to go.”
Fairstein, who headed the Manhattan sex crimes unit from 1976 until 2002, stepped down from her position in 2002 and is now a novelist. But Lederer still works full-time as an assistant district attorney. She could not be reached for comment, and David M. Schizer, dean of the law school, did not return several calls seeking comment.
Though the Black Law Student Association at Columbia has not formally taken a position on Lederer, several students contacted by Diverse anonymously expressed concerns about her visible teaching role on campus.
Calls for Lederer’s ouster intensified recently after a documentary made by filmmaker Ken Burns and his daughter Sarah was broadcast on PBS. Trisha Meilli, a 28-year-old investment banker, was raped and beaten, reportedly by a “wilding” mob of Black and Latino youth.
Police quickly arrested five suspects: Yusef Salaam, Raymond Santana, Kevin Richardson, Antron McCray, and Kharey Wise, who later said that their confessions were coerced by police. At the time, only a handful of people, the Reverend Al Sharpton, the most prominent among them, expressed support for the teenagers.
But after serving varying years in prison, the men were eventually released, and their convictions were vacated in 2002 after Matias Reyes, a convicted rapist and murderer who was already serving a life sentence for other crimes but who had not been charged in the attack on Meili, admitted that he had committed the assault when he was 17 and that he had acted alone.
But the city has refused to settle the case. “We believe that, based on the information that the police and prosecutors had at the time, they had probable cause to proceed and the confessions were sound,” says Celeste Koeleveld, the city’s executive assistant corporation counsel for public safety, who says that the documentary on the case was biased. “Mr. Burns and his daughter have publicly sided with the plaintiffs and their families, who are seeking hundreds of millions from New York City. The movie has crossed from documentary to pure advocacy.”
That talk frustrates Salaam, who spent eight years in jail for a crime he did not commit.”
“The city doesn’t want to admit any wrongdoing,” says Salaam. “They feel that we will just go away the longer it goes on, but we won’t. We lost so much time and our families lost so much, and no one who was responsible said that they were sorry about it. That’s not right. Somebody needs to stand up and take responsibility for the way the case was handled. There was nothing that linked us to this crime, and yet we were convicted and paid for it.”
Amos N. Jones, a professor of legal ethics and expert on race discrimination at Baptist-affiliated Campbell Law School in Raleigh, N.C., questioned why Lederer’s biography on the Columbia Law School website appeared to have touted her involvement in the Central Park jogger case “but recently expunged that legacy from it” after Burns’ documentary aired.
Jones said that, allegations of prosecutorial misconduct aside, lawyers have a professional obligation across jurisdictions to act honestly so as “not to bring the profession into disrepute.”
“As officers of the court, lawyers are supposed to model integrity, and as guardians at our profession’s gates, law professors have a special obligation to go about their professional pursuits with the utmost character,” says Jones. “At the very least, this biographical-sketch about-face suggests that somebody has some explaining to do.”
While perhaps she shouldn’t be fired for errors in her past, sure she has learned something from the biggest case of her career? Clearly there is still no true justice for those boys now men. No admission by Lederer or the City of New York, which I guess is to be expected but truly disappointing. That in itself is even more egregious. Many people made careers on that gross miscarriage of justice. That is unacceptable.
April 23, 2013 at 7:12 am
Fire Elizabeth Lederer NOW! http://org.credoaction.com/petitions/columbia-university-law-school-fire-elizabeth-lederer-as-lecturer-in-law
April 25, 2013 at 5:37 pm
Those People should burn in hell for what they did to those Boys now men I just don’t know how they can sleep at night and to be honest meili did not get her fame off of her story she got her fame off those five men and that is a shame. THEY WE’RE ALL VICTIMS !!!!!
May 7, 2013 at 8:41 pm
She should hardly be fired. A little research into the trial and pretrial hearings will show that the confessions were properly obtained and the objections of the defense were presented to the jury – all this after six weeks of hearing as to the admissibility of the confessions. By research I mean an actual understanding of the law and a review of the decisions – not jumping to conclusions based on Sarah Burns’s “documentary” (really a propaganda piece for the lawfirm she worked for and which is incidentally representing the defednants in their civil suit against NYC). The only thiing that we know now is that Reyes is the source of the DNA that the jury knew did not belong to any of the defendants. Even a little research into Reyes’ credibility and potential reasons for coming forward should make you take his story that he acted alone with a grain of salt. But then again I’m sure everyone here has already done their research berfore coming to their conclusions and hasnt been swayed by the hysteria surrounding this case.
May 15, 2013 at 5:28 pm
She should be ashamed!
May 17, 2013 at 8:47 am
Shame on her. Any evidence that did not support the case was ignored. She must have known at sometime in the case they were innocent, but for what ever reasons did not due the right thing. Shame on her and the detectives who railroaded these children.
June 19, 2013 at 9:14 pm
I have worked for lawyers for 34 years and I ordered “Central Park Five” DVD after seeing some ads about it and as I watch it now, I am OUTRAGED at the decision that was made. Now coming from Canada, we do not have the racism that exists in the U.S.A., however, any INTELLIGENT PROSECUTOR would have known that these boys were INNOCENT no matter what COLOR/RACE they were/are. Elizabeth, when you wake up each morning, look at yourself in the mirror and REMEMBER AND DON’T EVER FORGET WHAT YOU KNEW!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! May it haunt you just because you wanted the world to think you were smart. Shame on you!!!
August 17, 2013 at 7:26 pm
How can she sleep with the consequences of her lack of professional integrity that subjected these innocent youths to a life of incarnation to satisfy the medias lust for a conviction regardless of evidence? To ignore DNA or lack of it is an injustice to that can’t be ignored. Hopefully she will be made to suffer some of the suffering she has caused.
August 18, 2013 at 10:40 am
Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *
Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.
Could training in implicit bias be helpful at your institution?