Fueled By Rejection, Black Scholars Built College Language Association to LastMarch 27, 2014 |
NEW ORLEANS ― Just ask Dr. Kokavah Zauditu-Selassie if she’s ever been a member of the Modern Language Association, and suddenly the full professor of English at Coppin State University in Baltimore becomes deeply expressive.
“Never!” she says with a ring of defiance. “I don’t belong to any organization that didn’t allow Black people to be a member. When they finally opened up the door to us, I said, ‘I’m fine in the space you put me in.’”
For the last 25 years, Zauditu-Selassie has been an active member of the College Language Association (CLA), the scholarly organization that sprung up 77 years ago after the MLA — like many other academic organizations — abruptly shut their doors to the legions of African American scholars that were beginning to pave out careers within the academy.
While the MLA is quick to point out that there was never an official policy to exclude Blacks from participating in one of the world’s largest academic organizations, they concede that for decades its membership was less than eager to embrace African Americans into their scholarly ranks.
Faced with rejection, African Americans did what they have always done: they went out and created an organization of their own, spearheaded by the late Dr. Hugh Morris Gloster who was president emeritus of Morehouse College when he convened the first meeting of CLA. At the time, African American and Caribbean literature wasn’t even recognized as a formal course of study at most colleges and universities.
Fast forward to today.
CLA now has a membership of about 750 and gathers annually to focus exclusively on themes related to African American, Caribbean and African diaspora studies. Though much smaller than their MLA counterpart, this week CLA convention participants traveled to New Orleans from as far away as Nigeria, China and Japan.
“People who come to CLA are here for a very purposeful reason because they don’t see themselves as having to defend a tradition,” says Dr. Dana A. Williams, chair of the English Department at Howard University and vice president of CLA. “It exists on its own terms and with a level of complexity and sophistication that you don’t see anywhere else.”
Despite how the organization came into existence, Williams says that the not-for-profit now operates in an “autonomous space” where scholars get a chance at the convention to engage with each other in a low-pressure but academically rigorous setting that allows for informal meet and greets and the mentoring of younger academics.
The topics are diverse too, ranging from discussions about iconic Black authors like Octavia Butler and Zora Neale Hurston, to conversation on languages and identities in African and Trans-Caribbean Literature and Film.
Dr. Angelyn Mitchell, an associate professor of English at Georgetown University moderated a spirited roundtable titled, “Teaching African American Literary and Cultural Studies in the 21st Century.” The panelists discussed strategies on how to introduce Black canonical texts to a generation of students deeply immersed in hip hop culture.
“These are conversations that we need to have more,” says Mitchell who joined CLA as a graduate student back in the 1980s and has been active ever since. “You see friends who you don’t see often and it gives you a chance to focus on the specifics of the field. At MLA, you can’t really do that.”
Mitchell holds membership in both CLA and MLA, as do many Black scholars who attend CLA, despite the fact that less than five percent of the panels and discussions at the MLA convention which takes place in December or January each year, is devoted to Africa and the study of the diaspora.
That’s one of the reasons why Dr. James L. Hill, Chair of the Department of English, Modern Languages, and Mass Communications at Albany State University in Georgia let his MLA membership lapse many years ago.
“I just decided that CLA was a better fit,” says Hill, who added that the organization’s published journal features impressive work by scholars who can ably “negotiate American, western literature as well as African American literature.”
Early tensions between the two groups have improved. Now, MLA sends a representative to the CLA convention each year and offers financial support, while CLA is guaranteed a space on the MLA convention program.
“There is a good working relationship now,” says Williams.
Dr. Warren J. Carson, who served as immediate past president of CLA but who also holds membership in MLA, says that the two organizations function quite differently.
“I think CLA’ers probably go to MLA for the professional worth,” says Carson, who is the chief diversity officer and Associate Vice Chancellor for academic affairs at the University of South Carolina Upstate. “They come to CLA because it is such a sustaining body. It’s frankly like a family reunion. You not only engage in the scholarly dimension of the profession but also in the other dimensions you need to talk about. Things you probably wouldn’t feel as comfortable discussing at a MLA.”
Jamal Watson can be reached at email@example.com. You can follow him on twitter @jamalericwatson