Study Underscores Bias Obstacles for Women, Minorities in Engineering - Higher Education
Higher Education News and Jobs

Study Underscores Bias Obstacles for Women, Minorities in Engineering

Email




by Catherine Morris

Engineering remains one of the most male-dominated fields in STEM, with women comprising only 14 percent of engineers in the U.S. workforce. Studies show that it is a problem of attrition, or what some experts call a “leaky pipeline.” Women are less likely to complete their program of study in engineering, and once they graduate, many find it difficult to establish longevity in the field. An estimated 40 percent of women leave engineering by midcareer.

Professor Joan C. Williams is the study’s author.

Professor Joan C. Williams is the study’s author.

A new study from the Center for WorkLife Law at the University of California, Hastings College of the Law and the Society for Women Engineers (SWE) sheds light on factors that make it harder for women and people of color to succeed in the field, compared to their majority male counterparts. The study surveyed more than 3,000 engineers on their perceptions of bias in the field.

One female engineer said she had to keep reiterating her credentials when meeting upper-level management and new hires. Another said she was considered less motivated by her colleagues because she has children, even though she came in to the office on weekends and evenings to make up time lost to taking care of her children. Yet another said that women were expected to clean up after their male colleagues in her lab.

The findings and comments were unsurprising, study authors said, given current trends and gendered patterns of attrition in the workforce. Female, minority, and engineers who were over the age of 55 were significantly more likely to report experiencing bias than their male, majority colleagues.

Related:  Civil Rights Pioneer Comes “Full Circle” With New UTenn Job

For instance, women and engineers of color reported that they had to prove themselves repeatedly to their colleagues, while a majority male engineer’s competence, once established, was less likely to be questioned again. Among survey respondent, 68 percent of male and female engineers of color reported having to “prove it again,” compared to only 35 percent of White men.

Findings such as these show that bias in the workplace ultimately has a negative impact on all workers, said Joan C. Williams, a professor of law at UC Hastings and study author.

“Even majority men, once they become older, are stereotyped as lower in competence than younger people,” Williams said. “What this shows is that you really need to get these biases under control and to interrupt them, or else a whole series of folks are going to be disadvantaged, not just women or engineers of color, but also older engineers.”

Women also face an uphill battle compared to their male colleagues in areas like child care and maternity. Nearly 80 percent of men said that having children did not impact their colleagues’ perception of their commitment or competence, while 55 percent of women said it did.

For women, engineering can be “a pretty chilly climate,” Williams said. “You have to prove yourself over and over again, and a much narrower range of behaviors is accepted among women than in men. There’s pressure to do lower-value tasks, and they have less access to high-profile assignments. If you’re assertive you can be seen negatively, but if you’re not assertive enough you’re not a player. Once you have children you’re seen as significantly less committed.”

Related:  Temple University's Commitment to Diversity Questioned

An unusually high number of male engineers commented that diversity was a threat to the integrity of the field, Hastings said. Of the more than 3,000 male and female engineers who responded to the survey, nearly 897 left comments about their experiences in the field. While many women commented on their personal experiences and the discrimination that they faced, 17 percent of men commented to the effect that diversity was a threat to the integrity of the profession.

Peter Finn, SWE president, said that contrary to such beliefs, diversity is beneficial and vitally important to the field. Increasingly, companies are recognizing the inherent value of having a more diverse workforce, he said, pointing out that the study was funded by a coalition of corporations interested in learning how to mitigate problems of bias and retain more women and engineers of color.

“We know that diversity fuels innovation, so having multiple perspectives and people of different backgrounds, that’s what’s going to make organizations successful,” Finn said.

Staff writer Catherine Morris can be reached at [email protected]

RELATED ARTICLES >>
Jordan Putting St. Mary’s College on the Map MARY’S CITY, Md. — There is something quite bucolic about strolling through this small, historic town, where the lone college campus hugs the St. Mary’s River, which is lined with picturesque rowing boats that extend far beyond what the eye can see. ...
University of Oregon Professor Sues School Over Gender Bias EUGENE, Ore. — The University of Oregon has been hit with a lawsuit by one of its psychology professors over claims that she is being paid substantially less than several of her less-experienced male colleagues. The Register-Guard reports Jennifer...
Judge Dismisses Ex-rowers’ Suit Against University of Kansas LAWRENCE, Kan. — A judge dismissed a lawsuit against the University of Kansas by parents of two former rowers who allege they were sexually assaulted by a Jayhawk football player in a campus dorm. Douglas County District Judge B. Kay Hoff ruled, a...
Investigation: Ex-UTSA President Romo ‘Likely’ Sexually Harassed Women An internal investigation into former University of Texas at San Antonio president Dr. Ricardo Romo found that Romo “more likely than not” violated the UTSA’s sexual harassment policies, the San Antonio Express-News reported on Monday. Romo was ap...
Semantic Tags: