Create a free Diverse: Issues In Higher Education account to continue reading

South Carolina State University has been placed on warning for 12 months by its accrediting body, the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools, for failure to comply with the commission’s core requirements.

The December sanction was given following a report from the special committee assigned to review S.C. State’s governance and intercollegiate athletics. If the university fails to improve during this period, it faces the threat of probation, removal of accreditation or an extension of its warning period. The warning accuses the board of trustees of not giving the university president and faculty enough room to run the institution, its intercollegiate athletics and fundraising. It also states that the institution must show evidence that the board of trustees is not controlled by a minority of board members.

The activities of S.C. State’s board came into question after the widely publicized firing of President Andrew Huginie Jr. in 2007. Hugine is now suing the university as well as current and former board members for defamation and conspiracy.

The suit singles out former board chairman Maurice Washington as being instrumental in the alleged conspiracy.

Washington, who has continually dismissed these allegations by Hugine, is being challenged for his seat on the board by the president of S.C. State’s alumni chapter, Patricia Lott, as well as Bill Goodwin Jr., another alumnus.

Students learned about the SACS action during their winter break, and many are upset.

A New Track: Fostering Diversity and Equity in Athletics
American sport has always served as a platform for resistance and has been measured and critiqued by how it responds in critical moments of racial and social crises.
Read More
A New Track: Fostering Diversity and Equity in Athletics