Create a free Diverse: Issues In Higher Education account to continue reading

Report: Leadership Atop FBS Schools Still Mostly White, Male

ORLANDO, Fla. ― The top leadership positions among Football Bowl Subdivision schools and conferences remains significantly White and male, according to the report released Wednesday by The Institute for Diversity and Ethics in Sport.

The annual report indicates huge disparities in the percentage of gender and racial minorities serving as school presidents, athletic directors and faculty athletic representatives for the 128 FBS institutions in the 2015-16 academic year.

Overall, Whites held 342 of the 385 campus leadership positions (88.8 percent). White men held 101 of the 128 president positions (78.9 percent). Sixteen women and 11 non-White males currently serve as presidents in FBS ― down from 19 and 13, respectively, in 2014.

Report author Richard Lapchick said the impact of those disparities was highlighted this week when University of Missouri President Tim Wolfe resigned amid growing concern about his lack of awareness of racial tensions at the school.

“What seems to have happened at the University of Missouri I have found to be common on many campuses that I visit,” Lapchick said. “Students feel there is a disconnect between people of color and women and the administration on college campuses. Yet you can look on any college website in the country and I would think any one of them would have diversity listed among their key values.

“But women and people of color would say that there aren’t enough people who look like them in the faculty and in the athletic department.”

The report by the institute at the University of Central Florida indicates that, among athletic directors, White men hold 102 of 128 jobs (79.7 percent), an increase of 2 percent. Seventeen were non-White males, with no female African-American, Asian, Latina or Native American athletic directors at FBS schools.

A New Track: Fostering Diversity and Equity in Athletics
American sport has always served as a platform for resistance and has been measured and critiqued by how it responds in critical moments of racial and social crises.
Read More
A New Track: Fostering Diversity and Equity in Athletics