Study: Minority Student Enrollment Hasn’t Kept Pace With Demographic Trends in States That Have Affirmative Action Bans - Higher Education

Message to our Readers



Higher Education News and Jobs

Study: Minority Student Enrollment Hasn’t Kept Pace With Demographic Trends in States That Have Affirmative Action Bans

by Pearl Stewart

Enrollment of underrepresented minorities at public universities has not kept pace with demographic trends in states that have banned affirmative action, a new study finds.

In these states, the portion of underrepresented minorities among students admitted and enrolling in public universities has steadily lost ground relative to changing demographic trends among high school graduates, based on new research published April 6 in Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, a journal of the American Educational Research Association.

The study, by Mark Long, a professor of Public Policy and Governance at the University of Washington, and Nicole Bateman, a research analyst at the Brookings Institution, evaluates the long-term changes stemming from reversals of affirmative action, noting that previous research has examined the immediate effects of those actions.

Mark Long

The study includes an examination of admissions strategies that universities have implemented as alternatives to affirmative action, such as the inclusion of socioeconomic factors in admission decisions, increased outreach and financial support for low-income students and the elimination of admission preference for the children of alumni, but their report suggests that these efforts have not been able to fully replace race-based affirmative action.

“The point of our paper is to show that the degree of underrepresentation has not improved, while diversity measured as sheer percentage has improved,” Long told Diverse, explaining that “it’s the gap in the degree of underrepresentation that has not improved over 20 years. That’s why we’re arguing for netting out the change in the underlying composition of the high school graduates in the state. Once you do that, it reveals that the degree of representation has not improved.”

Long and Bateman analyzed trends in minority representation among applicants, admittees and enrollees in 19 selected public universities in states with affirmative action bans. The analysis extended from the time their bans went into effect through 2015.

Averaging across the 19 universities studied, in the year prior to the affirmative action ban, the share of underrepresented students of color (Black, Hispanic and Native American) among enrolled U.S. students was 15.7 percentage points below these students’ share among high school graduates in the respective states, according to the study.

Out of the 19 institutions in the study, the nine that are considered flagship institutions saw the underrepresentation gap grow from 11.2 percentage points to 13.9 percentage points immediately after the ban, and by 2015, the gap had grown to 14.3 percentage points. However, this gap rose to 16.8 percentage points, on average, in the year immediately after the ban, and the gap increased even more in subsequent years — to 17.9 percentage points.

For the subset of 10 “elite” universities, the same pattern held, with the underrepresentation gap widening from 18.7 percentage points to 21.7 percentage points immediately following a ban and growing to 21.9 percentage points by 2015.

“If, as a university administrator, all you’re trying to do is have more Black, Hispanic and Native American students, that’s happening because of population change,” Long noted.

However, he explained that university leaders have varying perspectives on increasing diversity. “One goal is that they just want to have a more diverse class, so any absolute increase in the share of their students who are Black, Hispanic and Native Americans is positive, whether it comes from a change in the demographics of the state or whether it comes from the university’s own efforts to recruit — any growth is positive.”

Long said the other perspective is that universities, especially public flagship universities, should be representative of their state so that the demography of the admitted and enrolled population should look similar to the demography of the high school graduates.

That’s where policymakers play an important role, he said.  The study pointed out that underlying societal conditions such as income disparities, unemployment and incarceration rates showed improvement during the period covered by the study, but at a slow pace.

“If we expect flagship public universities to reflect the racial and ethnic diversity of their states,” Long said, “then policymakers must work harder and better to alleviate these pre-college disparities and improve college readiness for underrepresented students.”

Semantic Tags: