More news reports are claiming that there is no relationship between need and how and where the Obama administration is spending its $787 billion in stimulus money.
“Stimulus spending is literally all over the map,” according to the investigative group ProPublica, which analyzed government stimulus contracts, grants and loans. A report dated Aug. 5 claims that “some battered counties are hauling in large amounts, while others that are just as hard hit have received little,” ProPublica claims.
The report follows similar ones by FOXnews.com and the Wall Street Journal suggesting that some of the areas hardest hit by the recession are receiving the least amount of stimulus money.
The WSJ found that high unemployment states such as Florida, North Carolina and Oregon are among those with the lowest per capita stimulus fund payouts, while well-off states such as North Dakota and South Dakota are receiving stimulus money at higher per capita rates.
ProPublica found similar patterns. It noted that Trigg County, Ky., for instance, has an unemployment rate of 15.8 percent and gets about $2,419 per resident in stimulus funds. One state over in Indiana, LaGrange County has an identical unemployment rate but gets only $33 per resident in stimulus funds.
The reports note that, of the stimulus funds earmarked for higher education, most go to Pell Grants to help lower-income students pay for college. A precise accounting for how the higher education funds are being spent will not be ready until October, a U.S. Department of Education spokesperson said. President Obama’s stimulus program to ease the effects of the recession was passed six months ago.
A new study of educational needs by region by the Lumina Foundation for Education shows that areas hardest hit by the recession and ones with the highest concentrations of minorities are the ones with the greatest need for improvements in education.
