Yet the pipeline of Black scholars poised to assume presidential status is growing
While higher education continues to be at odds over the toll the
affirmative action backlash is exacting on African American student
enrollment, the declining ranks of African American college and
university presidents have, barely been noticed.
According to research by Black Issues In Higher Education, there
are currently 105 African American presidents at traditionally White
institutions, four of whom are about to retire. In 1996, there were
113. The majority of Black presidents head two-year institutions, with
only thirty-six leading four-year schools. In addition to the chief
executives of the 102 historically Black institutions (most of whom are
Black), that means approximately 200 institutions out of the roughly
3,800 colleges and universities in the nation — both two-year and
four-year — are headed by African Americans.
“I’m disappointed in the numbers,” says Dr. James C. Renick,
chancellor of the University of Michigan-Dearborn. “You would think
that in 1998 there would be more people of color assuming roles of
leadership in education, because education has been so important to our
community.”
Dr. Gladys Styles Johnston, chancellor of the University of
Nebraska-Kearney, says, “There are fewer today than when I started five
years ago. The presidency is a high-turnover job and people are moving
on.”
Johnston is one of those who attribute the loss of numbers to the
“entire affirmative action debate.” At one time, she says “many
employers would make [race] one of the factors, along with
qualifications…. [Now] there is a certain segment of society where
the trends of the last fifteen years are being reversed.”
Dr. Albert C. Yates, president of Colorado State University,
agrees, adding, “When you combine what’s happening with the complexion
of the student body with Proposition 209 in California and what has
happened in Texas,… you have to believe that there is some
relationship to what we are beginning to see in terms of the strength
of the level of commitment to hiring presidents. It shouldn’t come as
too much of a surprise.”
